Articles

< Previous         Next >  
Cyclophilins A and B oppositely regulate renal tubular epithelial cell phenotype
Eduard Sarró1,* , Mónica Durán1 , Ana Rico1 , Diana Bou-Teen2 , Vanesa Fernández-Majada3 , Anthony J. Croatt4 , Karl A. Nath4 , Maria Teresa Salcedo5 , Justin H. Gundelach6,7 , Daniel Batlle8 , Richard J. Bram6,9 , Anna Meseguer1,10,11,*
1Renal Physiopathology Group, CIBBIM-Nanomedicine, Vall d’Hebron Research Institute, 08035 Barcelona, Spain
2Cardiovascular Diseases Group, Vall d’Hebron Research Institute, 08035 Barcelona, Spain
3Biomimetic Systems for Cell Engineering Laboratory, Institute for Bioengineering of Catalonia (IBEC), The Barcelona Institute of Science and Technology (BIST), 08028 Barcelona, Spain
4Division of Nephrology and Hypertension and Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
5Department of Pathology, Hospital Universitari Vall d’Hebron, 08035 Barcelona, Spain
6Department of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, College of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
7Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, College of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
8Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL 60611, USA
9Department of Immunology, College of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
10Departament de Bioquímica i Biologia Molecular, Unitat de Bioquímica de Medicina, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193 Bellaterra, Spain
11Red de Investigación Renal (REDINREN), Instituto de Salud Carlos III-FEDER, 28040 Madrid, Spain
*Correspondence to:Eduard Sarró , Email:eduard.sarro@vhir.org Anna Meseguer , Email:ana.meseguer@vhir.org
J Mol Cell Biol, Volume 12, Issue 7, July 2020, 499-514,  https://doi.org/10.1093/jmcb/mjaa005
Keyword: cyclophilins, epithelial phenotype, Slug, TGFβ, UUO, fibrosis

Restoration of kidney tubular epithelium following sublethal injury sequentially involves partial epithelial–mesenchymal transition (pEMT), proliferation, and further redifferentiation into specialized tubule epithelial cells (TECs). Because the immunosuppressant cyclosporine-A produces pEMT in TECs and inhibits the peptidyl-prolyl isomerase (PPIase) activity of cyclophilin (Cyp) proteins, we hypothesized that cyclophilins could regulate TEC phenotype. Here we demonstrate that in cultured TECs, CypA silencing triggers loss of epithelial features and enhances transforming growth factor β (TGFβ)-induced EMT in association with upregulation of epithelial repressors Slug and Snail. This pro-epithelial action of CypA relies on its PPIase activity. By contrast, CypB emerges as an epithelial repressor, because CypB silencing promotes epithelial differentiation, prevents TGFβ-induced EMT, and induces tubular structures in 3D cultures. In addition, in the kidneys of CypB knockout mice subjected to unilateral ureteral obstruction, inflammatory and pro-fibrotic events were attenuated. CypB silencing/knockout leads to Slug, but not Snail, downregulation. CypB support of Slug expression depends on its endoplasmic reticulum location, where it interacts with calreticulin, a calcium-buffering chaperone related to Slug expression. As CypB silencing reduces ionomycin-induced calcium release and Slug upregulation, we suggest that Slug expression may rely on CypB modulation of calreticulin-dependent calcium signaling. In conclusion, this work uncovers new roles for CypA and CypB in modulating TEC plasticity and identifies CypB as a druggable target potentially relevant in promoting kidney repair.